yyx990803/vite-vs-next-turbo-hmr — explained in plain English
Analysis updated 2026-07-17 · repo last pushed 2023-02-16
Compare Vite and Next.js with Turbopack before choosing a build tool for a new project.
Reproduce the benchmark on your own machine to verify the published timings.
Study how root-component versus leaf-component edits affect hot module replacement speed.
| yyx990803/vite-vs-next-turbo-hmr | yyx990803/html5-clear-v2 | github/safe-settings | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stars | 931 | 957 | 880 |
| Language | JavaScript | JavaScript | JavaScript |
| Last pushed | 2023-02-16 | 2023-04-26 | 2026-06-18 |
| Maintenance | Dormant | Dormant | Active |
| Setup difficulty | easy | easy | hard |
| Complexity | 2/5 | 2/5 | 4/5 |
| Audience | developer | developer | ops devops |
Figures from each repo's GitHub metadata at analysis time.
Just clone and run the benchmark scripts, no external infra needed.
A benchmark that times how fast Vite and Next.js with Turbopack update your browser after you save a file, so you can pick a build tool based on real numbers instead of marketing claims.
Mainly JavaScript. The stack also includes JavaScript, Vite, Next.js.
Dormant — no commits in 2+ years (last push 2023-02-16).
Setup difficulty is rated easy, with roughly 5min to a first successful run.
Mainly developer.
This repo across BitVibe Labs
Verify against the repo before relying on details.