tanykim/repdata_peerassessment1 — explained in plain English
Analysis updated 2026-07-17 · repo last pushed 2015-04-19
Study how to analyze step-count activity data and handle missing values with imputation.
Use as a reference example for writing reproducible research reports in R markdown.
Learn how to structure a data analysis so code, explanation, and results are combined and verifiable.
| tanykim/repdata_peerassessment1 | 0verflowme/alarm-clock | 0xhassaan/nn-from-scratch | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stars | — | — | 0 |
| Language | — | CSS | Python |
| Last pushed | 2015-04-19 | 2022-10-03 | — |
| Maintenance | Dormant | Dormant | — |
| Setup difficulty | easy | easy | moderate |
| Complexity | 2/5 | 2/5 | 4/5 |
| Audience | researcher | vibe coder | developer |
Figures from each repo's GitHub metadata at analysis time.
Requires R and RStudio to knit the R markdown document into an HTML report.
This repository contains a student's coursework submission for a class on reproducible research. The assignment asks students to analyze real data from a fitness tracker and write up their findings in a way that other people can understand and verify. The core task is straightforward: you have two months of step-count data collected at 5-minute intervals from an anonymous person, and you need to answer specific questions about their activity patterns. For example, how many steps did they take on average each day? When during the day were they most active? Do they move more on weekends than weekdays? The key twist is that some of the data is missing, so you also have to figure out a reasonable way to fill in the gaps before drawing your conclusions. What makes this assignment "reproducible research" is the process. Instead of just showing the final answers, you write all your code alongside your explanation in a special document format called R markdown. This means anyone reading your work can see exactly what you did, run the same code themselves if they want, and verify that your conclusions actually follow from the data. The assignment requires you to submit not just your analysis but also the HTML report it generates, plus any charts you created, all committed to GitHub so instructors and peers can review everything. This is a genuine university assignment from a Johns Hopkins online course on reproducible data analysis. It's designed to teach students how to work with real data, clean it up, analyze it, and communicate their process transparently, skills that matter whether you're doing academic research, journalism, or data work in industry. The peer review component means other students will evaluate whether the code is clear and the logic is sound.
A Johns Hopkins reproducible-research course assignment analyzing two months of fitness tracker step-count data using R markdown.
Dormant — no commits in 2+ years (last push 2015-04-19).
Setup difficulty is rated easy, with roughly 30min to a first successful run.
Mainly researcher.
This repo across BitVibe Labs
Verify against the repo before relying on details.