whatisgithub

What is reviewer?

ingar30/reviewer — explained in plain English

Analysis updated 2026-05-18

80PythonAudience · researcherComplexity · 3/5Setup · moderate

In one sentence

A multi-agent Python tool that automates peer review of academic economics papers, producing one consolidated report from several specialized AI reviewers.

Mindmap

mindmap
  root((reviewer))
    What it does
      PDF to review report
      Multiple AI reviewers
      Consolidated output
    Tech stack
      Python
      Codex CLI
    Use cases
      Check citations
      Verify numerical claims
      Grammar pass
    Audience
      Researchers
      Economics teams

Code map

Detail Auto

An interactive map of this repo's files and how they connect — its source is parsed live in your browser. Click Visualize to build it.

filefunction / class

What do people build with it?

USE CASE 1

Run a draft economics paper through mandatory and optional AI reviewers automatically

USE CASE 2

Get a single consolidated Markdown review report instead of coordinating reviewers by hand

USE CASE 3

Check bibliography accuracy and internal cross-references before submission

USE CASE 4

Evaluate identification strategy and robustness of results in an economics paper

What is it built with?

PythonCodex CLI

How does it compare?

ingar30/reviewersgloria/research-paper-pipelineclawdbrunner/captcha-solver
Stars808081
LanguagePythonPythonPython
Setup difficultymoderatemoderatemoderate
Complexity3/54/53/5
Audienceresearcherresearcherdeveloper

Figures from each repo's GitHub metadata at analysis time.

How do you get it running?

Difficulty · moderate Time to first run · 1h+

Requires Python 3.12 and the Codex CLI agent runner to orchestrate reviewers.

License is not specified in the description.

So what is it?

Reviewer is a Python-based tool that automates the peer-review process for academic economics papers using multiple AI agents working together. Think of it as an automated research assistant that reads a paper (provided as a PDF), runs it through several specialized reviewers, each checking a different aspect of the work, and then produces a single consolidated review report. The workflow starts by converting the PDF into structured text and checking that the conversion was clean enough to trust. From there, a set of mandatory reviewers always run: one checks internal cross-references and numbering, another verifies the bibliography, and a third catches grammar and copyediting issues. A pool of optional reviewers is also selected dynamically based on the paper, covering things like numerical accuracy, how well evidence supports claims, literature coverage, identification strategy, and robustness of results. Each reviewer produces a structured output in a standardized format, which is then validated, deduplicated, and assembled into a final Markdown report. The project uses Python 3.12 and a tool called Codex CLI (an AI coding and agent runner) to orchestrate the agents. It is designed for reproducibility: the shared code handles prompts, schemas, scripts, and tests, while the actual papers and generated reviews stay private on the user's own machine. Researchers or teams doing systematic paper evaluation would use this to get fast, consistent, multi-angle feedback on draft economics papers without manually coordinating multiple review passes.

Copy-paste prompts

Prompt 1
Help me set up Ingar30's reviewer tool to review my economics paper PDF
Prompt 2
Explain which mandatory and optional reviewers this tool runs and what each one checks
Prompt 3
Show me how to configure the reviewer tool to run with Codex CLI on Python 3.12
Prompt 4
Walk me through interpreting the consolidated Markdown review report this tool produces

Frequently asked questions

What is reviewer?

A multi-agent Python tool that automates peer review of academic economics papers, producing one consolidated report from several specialized AI reviewers.

What language is reviewer written in?

Mainly Python. The stack also includes Python, Codex CLI.

What license does reviewer use?

License is not specified in the description.

How hard is reviewer to set up?

Setup difficulty is rated moderate, with roughly 1h+ to a first successful run.

Who is reviewer for?

Mainly researcher.

Open on GitHub → Ask about another repo

This repo across BitVibe Labs

Verify against the repo before relying on details.