Study how to build a production grade queue and concurrency system in front of an LLM provider.
Benchmark the throughput and latency tradeoffs of bounded concurrency for AI inference.
Prepare for backend or AI infrastructure system design interviews using documented real experiments.
| gowtham-beep/ai-labs | 0xradioac7iv/tempfs | 7vignesh/pgpulse | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stars | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Language | TypeScript | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | moderate | moderate | moderate |
| Complexity | 4/5 | 3/5 | 4/5 |
| Audience | developer | developer | developer |
Figures from each repo's GitHub metadata at analysis time.
Requires Docker, Redis, and either a Groq API key or a local Ollama model.
This repository is a collection of self-directed weekend experiments about running large language model inference in production, treating the problem as a distributed systems challenge rather than just a matter of writing good prompts. The author's stated goal is to move past the common pattern of simply wrapping an API call and instead build and rigorously test the unglamorous plumbing that real AI infrastructure depends on, such as queues, controlling how many requests run at once, rate limiting, and circuit breakers that stop cascading failures. Each experiment, called a lab, is documented with real measured data rather than a polished summary, including the dead ends and bugs the author ran into along the way. At the time of this writing there is one completed lab, an LLM inference gateway that separates the queue from the workers processing requests and puts a limit on how many requests run simultaneously. That lab found that adding this kind of concurrency control improved the throughput of batches of requests by roughly four point seven times, while making the response time for any single individual request worse. The author frames these labs as a bridge between traditional backend engineering skills and modern AI operations work, mapping to the kind of system design and coding interview questions that come up when discussing infrastructure meant to handle slow, unreliable, or rate limited dependencies like LLM providers. The tech stack draws on well established production tools: Node.js and TypeScript for the core code, Fastify as the API framework, BullMQ and Redis for the queue, Docker, NGINX, and PM2 for running things in production, and Groq along with locally run Ollama models as the actual LLM providers being tested against.
A set of documented weekend experiments building and benchmarking production grade infrastructure for LLM inference.
Mainly TypeScript. The stack also includes TypeScript, Node.js, Fastify.
No license information is provided in the README.
Setup difficulty is rated moderate, with roughly 1h+ to a first successful run.
Mainly developer.
This repo across BitVibe Labs
Verify against the repo before relying on details.