whatisgithub

What is critically-reviewing-literature?

asaki9385/critically-reviewing-literature — explained in plain English

Analysis updated 2026-05-18

21Audience · researcherComplexity · 2/5Setup · easy

In one sentence

A Cursor agent skill that guides an AI through four checkpoints to write a genuinely critical academic literature review, based on Fernandez (2019).

Mindmap

mindmap
  root((Lit Review Skill))
    What it does
      Assemble arrange assess write
      Critical gap finding
      Answerable research question
    Tech stack
      Cursor agent skill
      Markdown templates
    Use cases
      Thesis lit review chapter
      Standalone review paper
      Restructure old review
    Audience
      Academic researchers
      Grad students

Code map

Detail Auto

An interactive map of this repo's files and how they connect — its source is parsed live in your browser. Click Visualize to build it.

filefunction / class

What do people build with it?

USE CASE 1

Write a critical literature review chapter for a thesis or dissertation

USE CASE 2

Restructure a citation heavy review into one organized by concept

USE CASE 3

Identify real research gaps and generate an answerable research question

What is it built with?

Cursor

How does it compare?

asaki9385/critically-reviewing-literature0whitedev/detranspiler0xluk3/zk-resources
Stars212121
LanguagePython
Setup difficultyeasyhardeasy
Complexity2/54/51/5
Audienceresearcherdeveloperresearcher

Figures from each repo's GitHub metadata at analysis time.

How do you get it running?

Difficulty · easy Time to first run · 5min

Requires an AI agent client that supports custom skills, such as Cursor.

So what is it?

This repository is a skill package for AI coding assistants such as Cursor, designed to help researchers write critical literature reviews. It is based on a method from a 2019 academic paper by Fernandez that teaches new researchers how to review a body of academic work rather than just summarizing papers one by one. The skill targets common problems in weak literature reviews: long lists of citations that read like a phone book, summaries stacked together without synthesis, description without critique, citing papers secondhand without reading them, claiming contributions or gaps without evidence, giving up too early when a topic seems unstudied instead of adapting nearby research, and research questions that are too broad to actually answer with a feasible study design. To fix these problems, the skill walks an AI agent through four required stages: assemble the relevant literature, arrange it into categories and comparison tables, assess it critically against the standards of its academic field, and only then write the review text. The process builds in five kinds of outcomes a good review should achieve, such as showing what is already known, identifying real gaps, and generating an answerable research question. Each stage has required outputs, and the agent is not allowed to skip ahead, for example it cannot write the review body before completing the comparison tables, and it cannot claim a contribution or gap without finishing the assessment step first. This is meant for writing or revising literature review sections of a thesis, dissertation, or standalone review paper, for finding real gaps in existing research, and for turning an old, list like review into one organized around concepts. It is not meant for simple grammar polishing, general research methods coaching unrelated to literature, or downloading full text from paid databases. Installation means copying the skill folder into a personal skills directory used by Cursor or a similar agent client, or uploading the packaged zip file directly if the client supports it. Once installed, mentioning a literature review task in a new conversation triggers the skill automatically. The package includes a main instructions file, a template file with search plans and writing patterns, and this README, and it credits the original Fernandez 2019 paper without copying its copyrighted text.

Copy-paste prompts

Prompt 1
Using this critical literature review skill, help me write a lit review on my topic.
Prompt 2
These PDFs are my source material, write the literature review chapter for my thesis in Chinese.
Prompt 3
My existing review reads like a list of citations, restructure it using the Fernandez method.

Frequently asked questions

What is critically-reviewing-literature?

A Cursor agent skill that guides an AI through four checkpoints to write a genuinely critical academic literature review, based on Fernandez (2019).

How hard is critically-reviewing-literature to set up?

Setup difficulty is rated easy, with roughly 5min to a first successful run.

Who is critically-reviewing-literature for?

Mainly researcher.

Open on GitHub → Ask about another repo

This repo across BitVibe Labs

Verify against the repo before relying on details.